Allied Engineering Corporation

Example
Analysis examples of ADVENTURECluster.
Modal frequency analysis of cantilever
  • We show here eigenvalue and modal frequency analyses of a cantilever using beam elements. The cross section of the cantilever is not a perfect circle since production tolerance is assumed, which means the difference between two geometric moments of inertia are given in the two directions of the cross section. In addition, non-structural weight is assumed, which is not taken into account in the pure beam analysis of model. The result is compared with that of MSC.Nastran.
    Beam model
    Fig. 1 Beam model
  • The specification of the cantilever is as follows:
    • Cross section: circle
    • Length: 3m
    • Radius: 0.014m
    • Geometric moments of inertia: Iy = 2.9x10-8m4, Iz = 3.1x10-8m4
    • Torsional constant: 3.0~10-8m4
    • Mass density: 2.65~104N/m3 (=2.703103kg/m3)
    • non-structural weight: 2.414 N/m
    • Young's modulas: 7.1~1010N/m2
    • Poisson ratio: 0.33

  • The number of elements and nodes are 100 and 101, respectively.

  • The following table shows the eigenvalues obtained from ADVENTURECluster and MSC.Nastran. The results coincide well enough.

    Table 1 Obtained eigenvalues
    ModeADVENTUREClusterNastran
    12.040982.04097
    22.110182.11017
    312.789112.7891
    413.222713.2227
    535.806135.8061
    637.020237.0202
    770.158470.1583
    872.537372.5373
    9115.965115.965
    10119.897119.897
    11173.213173.213
    12179.086179.086
    13241.900241.900
    14250.102250.102
    15322.022322.022
    16332.941332.941
    17398.623398.623
    18413.576413.576
    19427.599427.599
  • Then we perform modal frequency analysis. The excitation and evaluation points are are taken at the same point on the surface at the center of the cantilever and at the surface on the free end of the cantilever. The modal attenuation is assumed to be 2% of the critical damping under 10Hz region, and to be 5% of the critical damping over 10Hz region.
Excitation points and evaluation points
Fig. 2 Excitation points and evaluation points

  • The displacement and phase responce in the x-direction at the point 1 and 2 in the figure are shown in the following figures. The results of MSC.Nastran and ADVENTURECluster coincide well enough.
Contact Us
Contact us at:
postmaster@alde.co.jp

if you have any questions.

Fig. 3 Displacement responce at point 1Fig. 4 Phase responce at point 1
Fig. 5 Displacement responce at point 2Fig. 6 Displacement responce at point 2

ANALYSIS EXAMPLES

(C) 2001-2012 Allied Engineering Corporation. All rights reserved.